Performance
Equivalency
Enter a performance
Summary
–
Purdy points
–
VO₂ max ml/kg/min
–
Effort % VO₂ max
–
400m split avg pace
Equivalent performances
| Distance | Purdy | VO₂ | Cameron | Riegel | Average |
|---|
Equivalent times across four formulas. The Average column is the unweighted mean; the spread between Riegel and Cameron is your honest uncertainty band.
How each number is computed
- Purdy Gardner and Purdy running curve
- A log-log fit to the world-record envelope returns a standard time at every distance; the score is
1000 · Tstd(D) / T. Equivalents come from inverting the same envelope. Equal-score runs are equally close to the all-time fastest performance ever recorded at their distance. - VO₂ Daniels and Gilbert oxygen model
- From the race pace, compute the oxygen cost of running at that velocity (a polynomial in m/min). Divide by the fraction-of-VO₂-max that race duration can sustain (a sum of two exponentials in race duration). The result is implied VO₂ max, a physiological constant. Equivalent times at other distances are the times whose implied VO₂ max equals it, solved by bisection.
- Cameron Pete Cameron's distance-aware fade
- Generalises Riegel: pace multiplied by a per-distance correction
a(D) = 13.49681 − 0.048865·D + 2.438936·D−0.7905(D in miles) is the invariant. The correction is steeper at sprint distances and gentler past the half marathon, matching observed fade more closely than a single exponent. - Riegel Peter Riegel's exponent
- The classic:
T₂ = T₁ · (D₂/D₁)1.06. One exponent, every distance. Tends to overpredict marathon time from a 5k and underpredict mile time from a 10k, but it remains the field's most-cited starting point. - Average Unweighted mean
- The four formulas disagree by design. Their average is a reasonable single estimate; their spread is a reasonable uncertainty bound. If Cameron and Riegel disagree by more than about 3%, treat the answer with caution.